These are just a few quick and easy presets for specific use cases. If you use the same settings in different software, which means same colorimeter correction (display type in X-Rite i1 Profiler), white point target, calibration tone curve, then results are usually very close to one another.
I would personally use only displaycal, I wouldn’t trust the x-rite software. Why would there be such a huge difference in calibration time and final result? Am I doing something wrong here, perhaps a setting? If we’re talking preference here, I 100% prefer the Displa圜AL results, but I want to be sure it is also accurate as well. Displa圜AL produces a much brighter and less orange final result. I tested this out by editing a photo in Lightroom and viewing it using different monitors and devices and immediately I can tell exposure is all wrong.
#X rite colormunki display calibrator software#
The X-Rite software calibrates it VERY, VERY dark and very orange. Not sure if it’ll matter, but the Dell is the touch enabled 4K model, which has a wide gaumet display (nearly 100% sRGB and AdobeRGB).ĭispla圜AL takes considerably longer than the X-Rite software’s 5 minute calibration time, and it produces a brighter and less orange final result. I recently purchased an X-Rite ColorMunki Display and have been playing around with calibrating my Dell and have been getting different results between the X-Rite software and Displa圜AL.
0 kommentar(er)
